At a time when computer programs are threatening to become competent journalists, capable of spitting out clear-headed reports on financial earnings reports and the like, this could get a little personal. But I thought I would draw your attention to a provocative statement posted on Wednesday by Kevin Kelly, the Wired magazine co-founder and author of “What Technology Wants.”
Here’s what Kelly has to say about robots stealing our jobs:
The fact that a task is routine enough to be measured suggests that it is routine enough to go to the robots. In my opinion, many of the jobs that are being fought over by unions today are jobs that will be outlawed within several generations as inhumane.
If a job is so routine that it could be done by robots – usually robots that can’t really think but are really good at doing mechanical tasks over and over – will it be seen as “inhumane” by future generations? And – gasp! – are today’s punch-out-the-facts journalism jobs going to be seen by our future selves as harmfully routine and monotonous? This takes the idea of a “paragraph factory” to a whole new level.
This is obviously not an endorsement, just a conversation starter.
Feel free to debate in the comments section below.
Culled From: CNN Tech